Sloan responds to questions on IQ and SQ:

Any message I get that may be of general interest to visitors to the SQ web site is added to this section, along with my reply. This preserves the dialogue as a sort of FAQ (frequently asked questions).

Period covered: January 1, 2000 to October 31, 2004

Go to: for questions from 11/2004 on or questions prior to 2002

Return to: Home Page

Comments to: VanSloan@yahoo.com


Date:

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:11:58 -0700 (PDT)

From:

"tayfun doðan" <dogantayfun@yahoo.com>

Subject:

SQ

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

hi , I am studying about social intelligence for my master
thesis. but I couldnt reach enough document about SQ
especially SQ SCALES. Can you help me? if you help me
I will be very happy.

Sloan replies: Tayfun, there are over 140 pages on my SQ website. Check out http://SQ.4mg.com/site_outline.htm, which lists and provides links to all them. You might start with the page on Range and calculation of SQ scores, which includes a graph of actual SQ data from a classroom.


From:

Tekno567@aol.com

Date:

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:19:20 EDT

Subject:

IQ information

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

do you know what the average iq is for a 14 year old?

Sloan replies: At every age level, the average IQ is now set up to be 100. But that does not mean that an average 14 year old would get the same number of right answers on an IQ or SAT test as someone 18 or older. Traditionally that 14yo would have been expected to score 14/18 or 0.78 as well as an adult. But psychologists have moved away from age-differentiated IQ scores, and I am not aware of any such current data.


Date:

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:59:16 -0400

Subject:

Re: Age

From:

"Will Bennett" <wbennett@theoakwoodschool.org>

To:

"Van Sloan" <vansloan@yahoo.com>

I have a question for you.  How does age affect spatial ability?

Sloan replies: Will, check out the findings and graph on my http://SQ.4mg.com/IQage.htm webpage. Spatial ability is one of the fluid intelligences that seem to decline after early adulthood.


From:

"Stacey"

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Subject:

Questions about IQ's

Date:

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:43:12 -0500

As a child I was tested, my score at that time was 136, however in the 18 years that have now passed since that was done I feel my IQ quite possibly has dropped dramatically? The score was never actually told to me until about 5 years after the initial test by a well meaning teacher that felt it would motivate me to study more for 6th grade classes. My family never spoke about the score. Still to this day I have never seen the papers or official report on my score.

This is my question to you?? Do you feel that a person's IQ could severely drop 30 or more points over the period of 18 years? I have never taken another formal test, only the generic ones they give for free online. They say my score now is only 115. Is that a possible thing or should I go and get my self re-tested at a reputable testing center?

Thank you for your time, Stacey

Sloan replies: Stacey, it's not likely that your IQ has dropped 21 points. If you took an SAT or ACT test for college, you can get a good IQ of your IQ using the chart at my http://SQ.4mg.com/IQ-SATchart.htm webpage. See my response to similar questions at http://SQ.4mg.com/usingSQ.htm - on 9/24/04 and 9/17/04.


Date:

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:58:54 -0700

From:

"Scott Goodman" <arkbane@shaw.ca>

Subject:

Mulitple Intelligences "Theory"

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Hello,   I am currently writing a short essay debunking multiple intelligence "theory".  I have corresponded with several people on the essay so far, including Dan Willingham and Jim Delisle.  I have been trying to track online down copies of Perry Klein's critique and exchange with Gardner in the Canadian Journal of Education.  Do you know where they can be found and do you have any other references to suggest?
Scott Goodman, British Columbia 

Sloan replies:  Scott, perhaps you saw my MI webpage http://SQ.4mg.com/MIcriticisms.htm   Unfortunately I do not have more to offer beyond the links on that page.   I think that even Gardner would agree that his MI theory is outside the mainstream of psychological thinking.  


From:

"Nicholas Ballard" <nicholas_ballard@msn.com>

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Subject:

Hi

Date:

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:59:32 -0600

Hi, how are you doing?  In the newspaper article, it said that
hair length, short preferred, has a negative affect on SQ.  I 
was wondering why that is?
Thanks, Nick

Sloan replies: Nick, the negative reaction to long hair was only for males. (See all traits rated at : http://sq.4mg.com/traits_2437.htm). What I saw when SQ surveys were done in high school classrooms was that students were reacting more against the anti-social attitudes of those with long hair, rather than to the hair itself. This contrasted with their negative reaction to fat females, which seemed to be a real physical prejudice.


Date:

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:57:53 -0400

Subject:

Spatial Abilities

From:

"Will Bennett" <wbennett@theoakwoodschool.org

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Dear Van.

I am doing a science fair experiment to see how age and gender affects spatial abilities. I read your article and found it very interesting. Could you tell me about the IQ and gender factors of spatial abilities? Thank you.

Will Bennett of The Oakwood School

Sloan replies: Will, my http://sq.4mg.com/male-femaleIQ.htm webpage includes "Ability types at which males are better: The largest difference is that in spatial ability; the mental manipulation of figures in two or more dimensions. The difference varies from .3 to .5 SD." SD means Standard Deviations, which you can see marked just below the graph at http://sq.4mg.com/IQbasics.htm

 


From:

"Lisa Nilsen (TEXT100 NZ)" <lisa.nilsen@text100.co.nz>

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Subject:

AQ

Date:

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:51:22 +0800

Hi Van

I've been reading with interest your work on the adversity quotient, and wondered if you had conducted any work on an 'ambition quotient' or know of anyone else who has? Many thanks for your help.

Lisa Nilsen

Sloan replies: Lisa, yes I have done work on measuring ambition. Check out my webpages starting at http://sq.4mg.com/w_ambition.htm I did develop a type of Ambition Quotient. As reported in item 4 at http://sq.4mg.com/SuccessSQ-EI.htm: "In six high school classes which took a Jobs/ Ambition survey, the males did indeed score higher in Ambition than did the females (101 vs 97) " Like most looking at success, I believe that Ambition has much more influence than Adversity Quotient. For example, see "Aspirations appear to be very important" at http://SQ.4mg.com/Zax.htm


Date:

Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:42:04 -0400

From:

"Mary Kaminski" <mkamin@leeca.org

Subject:

screening minorities as potentially gifted

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

I am the gifted coordinator for Lorain County and one of my districts is Oberlin, Ohio.  This is a multi mixed ratio of minorities.  The concern has been raised that the minorities are not being identified because of the structure of the tests they are given.  Do you have any suggestions for a more reliable test.
Thanks, Mary Lou Kaminski

Sloan replies: Mary, you describe a common problem in many Gifted and college admissions programs - a problem of unrealistic expectations. When the average IQ for groups range from 103 for Asians to 85 for African-Americans, it is not realistic to expect any IQ test to identify similar percentages of gifted minorities. But there seems to be little difference among racial groups in skills that are just as important to financial success as IQ. See http://SQ.4mg.com/giftedFL.htm for a newspaper article on how Florida schools are using these other talents to help identify students for their Gifted programs.


From:

"Miroslav Milosevic" <miki_m@beotel.yu>

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Subject:

about your IQ country page, Sir

Date:

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:30:13 +0200

Why you still treat Serbia as a global reject?

Why is it out of the list?

Sloan replies: Miroslav, nobody I know considers Serbia a global reject. But you do raise a good question about my http://SQ.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm page. The list of national IQ's includes Slovenia and Croatia but no other parts of the former Yugoslavia. The source list of 185 national IQ's at http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/article_intelligence/t4.htm adds Macedonia, but not Serbia or Bosnia. I am forwarding this email to Richard@RLynn.co.uk (the developer of the national IQ numbers), in the hopes that he will answer your question.

Response from Lynn's co-author

Date:

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:59:32 +0200

Subject:

Serbia

From:

"Tatu Vanhanen" <tatu4@saunalahti.fi>

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Dear Van Sloan,

My colleague Richard Lynn forwarded to me your question concerning  Serbia's national IQ. In our 2002 book, we gave national IQs for Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, and Yugoslavia. Bosnia and Herzegovina was excluded from That study. Yugoslavia included Serbia and Montenegro at that time. So Serbia was not excluded. Our next possible book will cover also Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Best regards,  Tatu Vanhanen

Sloan comments further: Miroslav, here is the explanation from the expert on your October 7 question. At http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/article_intelligence/t4.htm the IQ for Yugoslavia is shown as 93, based on Croatia 90, Slovenia 95.


From:

DrWilliamCorrado@aol.com

Date:

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:19:54 EDT

Subject:

Are you certain more Blacks live in the South?

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

I take issue with your reasoning about the IQ scores and Blacks. I do not believe more African Americans live in Southern states at all. I think it is fair to say that large, metropolitan areas are more likely to contain higher-functioning, slightly more intelligent people than average due to industry, technology and better earnings. I do not believe the ACT or SAT are fair measurements of IQ either. These are tests for students who are seeking significantly advanced higher education.

Dr. William Christopher Corrado
Director of Education
TITUS FINE ART
430 North Rodeo Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210

Sloan replies: Dr. Corrado, let's check the data. I had written that "The most likely reason for the lower IQ's in southern states is their significant Black population." The chart below (from http://www.ofm.wa.gov/pop/race/minority_data_release.xls) shows that most of the states with a high percentage of minorities are Southern. The minority numbers in New Mexico, California, Texas, and probably New York include large Latino components. One could calculate the percentages of Blacks in states from census data at http://www.census.gov/population/projections/state/stpjrace.txt

2000 Modified Race Data, Bureau of the Census

Percent
Ranking
State
Minority
Total
of Total
1
Hawaii
          929,095 
        1,211,537 
76.69
2
District of Columbia
          410,799 
          572,059 
71.81
3
New Mexico
          997,610 
        1,819,046 
54.84
4
California
      17,813,298 
      33,871,648 
52.59
5
Texas
        9,864,855 
      20,851,820 
47.31
6
Mississippi
        1,114,392 
        2,844,658 
39.17
7
Maryland
        1,995,919 
        5,296,486 
37.68
8
New York
        7,095,123 
      18,976,457 
37.39
9
Louisiana
        1,666,018 
        4,468,976 
37.28
10
Georgia
        3,041,656 
        8,186,453 
37.15
11
Arizona
        1,838,585 
        5,130,632 
35.84
12
Nevada
          686,070 
        1,998,257 
34.33
13
Florida
        5,472,183 
      15,982,378 
34.24
14
South Carolina
        1,354,212 
        4,012,012 
33.75
15
New Jersey
        2,809,838 
        8,414,350 
33.39
16
Alaska
          200,562 
          626,932 
31.99
17
Illinois
        3,948,665 
      12,419,293 
31.79
18
North Carolina
        2,388,370 
        8,049,313 
29.67
19
Alabama
        1,316,564 
        4,447,100 
29.61
20
Virginia
        2,090,472 
        7,078,515 
29.53
28
Washington
        1,214,291 
        5,894,121 
20.60

 

On ACT and SAT being fair representation of IQ, there are many leading professors (as Gardner and Steele) who feel they are. See their comments at http://SQ.4mg.com/IQ-SAT.htm The IQ's of SAT and ACT test takers have been reduced by an average of 10 points to generate a set of state IQ scores averaging 100. For most states, a very large percentage of high school graduates took one of the two tests. There is no reason to suspect that actual IQ's in states with significant Black populations not taking the test would be higher than states with largely Whites not taking the test. If anything, the actual IQ's in Southern states might be lower than I calculated.


Date:

Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:00:25 -0700 (PDT)

From:

"Parhatsathid Napatalung" <parhat@yahoo.com>

Subject:

Re: Meet in Bangkok in November?

To:

"Van Sloan" <vansloan@yahoo.com>

Note: This email is from the creator of http://SQ.4mg.com/corrupt.htm - one of the most viewed pages on this website.

Dear Van Sloan:

I am more than happy to meet you in Bangkok in November. And yes, your SQ is indeed very interesting and hope to discuss more. The reason why corruption vs. IQ topic came up was based on a long standing observation that businessmen hires an executive on his credibility more than his intelligence. Which is an important point why corruption which is measurable form of credibility is more important than intelligence.

As such, this makes your SQ economically relevant. One of the form of intelligence which completely escapes IQ other than SQ is perhaps, common sense or the "big picture" holistic kind of thought - an ability that is so hard to find these days especially in Asia. The trend toward specialists in U.S. is occuring with so many specialists that holistic approach (as in Medicine) completely escapes them, something I referred to as "Rain Man" intelligence (based on movie by Dustin Hoffman and Tom Cruise). Rain Man means the person knows a lot but understands nothing.

Well, anyway see you in November. I might visit your sight and add some more updates if I find them relevant. Thank you very much. Ted

Sloan replies: Ted, it will be fun to meet and exchange ideas face to face. On a recent trip to Bali, I heard much about corruption in Indonesia. America has some well publicized business problems, but corruption does not pervade everyday affairs. When you revisit my SQ website, you might want to start with http://SQ.4mg.com/site_outline.htm which lists all pages. I have added several recently, such as http://SQ.4mg.com/latino.htm which starts with data you developed and presents observations for Central and South American nations.

 


Date:

Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:45:23 -0700 (PDT)

From:

"michael " <----@yahoo.com>

Subject:

about IQ Tests

To:

VanSloan@yahoo.com

Hello Sir,  I have a big problem and I hope you can help me out. 
I don't trust myself :-( and I have only high school.
I had a problem with math but I believe that there was
no good teachers in the school to help me understand
good. I'm 22 now. I'm Egyptian. I took 4 IQ Tests
(Online) 130, 120 and 110 this was my scores. some
people said that Online IQ Test is not good so what
can you say?    what can I do?
Thanks, Michael

Sloan replies: Michael, the wide variation in your IQ results is proof that online IQ tests are not very reliable. For suggestions, see my response to GKW on 17 Sept 2004 below


From:

"Andy Beresford" <andyb40@earthlink.net>

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

Subject:

jewish iq

Date:

Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:11:55 -0400

I found your site on a search for the Bell Curve graph. I thought I'd give you my two cents worth:

"Jews have an average IQ that is .84 standard deviations above that of white gentiles. The average for white gentiles is 100. For Jews it is 112."

I am sure this is a result of the strict inbreeding that Jews practice, always warning against intermarriage, and the high pressure parenting of "be a doctor or a lawyer, or marry one, "etc among their own.

In our society however they preach the exact opposite for us, and were instrumental in changing our immigration laws, the civil rights movement, striking down our laws banning interracial marriage, and now greatly encouraging it on tv.

I think it would be hard to even test white IQ in the U.S. as there are so many of even slightly mixed race, and as Jews themselves tell us, there is no genetic reason for IQ disparity, only white racism and neglect, poorly funded inner city schools, etc. are to blame. Many "experts" even tell us now there is no such thing as race.

Sloan replies: Andy, racial categories for IQ group averages are usually determined by self-marking, such as by the takers of SAT tests. Group differences in IQ are noticeable, even when adjusted for income and social class. Since most researchers agree that IQ is largely fixed by age five, IQ must have a large genetic component. My http://SQ.4mg.com/IQdifferenes.htm page describes current thinking on the causes of group IQ differences, as with Jews.


Date:

Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:57:22 -0700 (PDT)

From:

"G. K. W." < -----@yahoo.com>

Subject:

IQ Test and results

To:

vansloan@yahoo.com

I took an online test and it gave me my score, But I'm
not satisfied. I don't think it was a very acurate
test. I scored a 120 but I feel that if I were to take
a more acurate test that I would score lower. I took
the test at www.tickle.com. I'm not so sure how
acurate they are, so I was wondering if you could give
me a web site that has a more acurate test. Before I
took the test at tickle.com I've never taken an IQ
test before. I know usually for a very acurate test
you have to pay, but I can't afford it right now with
our finances being so poor. If you could help me out
that would be much appriciated.

Sloan replies: It's sensible to wonder about the results of online IQ tests. I do not recommend any as truly accurate, but prefer ones with time controls. If you really want to know your IQ, you might consider taking the SAT-1 test. Many employers feel they are good measures of intelligence, a useful asset in most jobs. You can use the chart at http://SQ.4mg.com/IQ-SATchart.htm to translate SAT into IQ scores.


From:

OneAlanCox@aol.com  
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:58:54 EDT
Subject: Mexican Immigration
To: VanSloan@yahoo.com

Mr. Sloan:    I have enjoyed a great deal of what you have written on your websites; however, one comment, for such an intelligent man, struck me as being just plain silly. You write:

"On average, migrants with larger IQ's and ambition are able to foil the US border protection systems, often on a 2nd or 3rd attempt. In contrast, their less talented countrymen are turned back or get discouraged from even trying to enter the US illegally. The net result is that the pool of talented people in the US grows, while other countries suffer a "brain drain." I do not know where you reside in the US or what your experience has been in regard to meeting and/or working with illegal Mexican immigrants but I have lived 18 years in Houston, TX, have spents summers in Central America and just returned from spending almost 2 years in Mexico.  I know them well.   Those crossing the border from the Mexico into the US are usually the poorest of the poor and the least intelligent of all Mexicans.  These are usually the least successful in their own countries and have IQ's lower than the average Mexican.  We are by no means a "brain drain" on Mexico.  I wish that we were. If we start to recruit their professors, engineers, talented artists, doctors, etc. then I could agree.  A simple, well organized IQ test of Mexican immigrants will dispell any notion that we are a brain drain on Mexico.   Our "rather porous" border policy may exist for many reasons, one of which is most certainly to have access to "cheap labor," but it is not as a source of "intellectually gifted" people. The Best to You,    Alan

Sloan replies: Alan, thanks for your helpful comments.  They have led me to revise the paragraph you quoted. While I believe the number of work visas for the talented ought to be increased, it seems that the current immigration system is working to the benefit of the US economy. Revised part of http://SQ.4mg.comn/IQdifferences.htm : 7. Current US border enforcement procedures may contribute to the economic strength of the US.  On one hand, high IQ individuals outside the US are encouraged by employers here to get US work visas.  On another track, the semi-porous border with Mexico tends to select for desirable workers.  On average, the migrants with greater ambition and above average IQ are able to foil the US border protection systems. As in point 1 above, the average IQ of Mexican-Americans is greater than the average IQ in Mexico.  The net result is that the pool of talented workers in the US grows, to the detriment of their native countries.  One drawback might be the feisty youth gangs in Los Angeles and other barrios of illegals. But the overall benefits of an inflow of ambitious talent filtered illegally into the US likely far exceed such drawbacks.


From:

SaVaGeAssMeXiCaN@aol.com  
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 00:28:30 EDT
Subject: Re: IQ Findings
To: vansloan@yahoo.com

If Anglos are so intelligent, why have they only become civlized in the last 2,000 years? They are intellectual babies in comparison to the Mayans, Aztecs, Incas, Egyptians, Babylonians, and the Chinese. If you really believe that education has nothing to do with the intelligence testing success, your thinking is flawed. Perhaps you should open your mind to other possibilities. The United States has only been the world's greatest power for the last half-century. The world has been here for hundreds of millions of years. They have dominated a rather short period of the history of the world.

Why do you not have any of the indigenous American groups listed on those civilizations? The Olmec civilization dates back to 3,000 BC, and that date is being pushed further back with every discovery. How can you not include a culture as advanced as the Mexica (Aztec), Maya and Inca? The American people today couldn't build the pyramids of Egypt or Mexico/Central America. You do not consider these civilizations advanced. The reason why you do not know of any "influential figures" is because the Spaniards burned all of the Mexica & Mayan literature. It took 3 straight days to burn all of the books of the Mexica.

You cannot say that the takeover of the Americas came due to the invasion of an advanced culture. Unleashing bio-weaponry (smallpox) and using inventions (gunpowder, iron melding) from other cultures does not mean a culture is more advanced. For example, the Germanic tribes overtook the Roman empire, which was far more advanced than the German nomads.Several influential philosophers of the Mexica were named Quetzalcoatl after the Aztec deity. If all of the books of the Americans today were destroyed, their statues demolished, and their history oppressed, we would hear future civlizations speaking the same nonsense that ignorant Eurocentric thinkers now claim.

Sloan replies:   Your emails show that my websites have stimulated your thinking (both my IQ one and http://wlc.8m.net - World Leadership Centers).  It is impossible to completely remove one's cultural biases in matters like IQ and history.   In these areas I have tried hard to present impartial data and generally accepted theories.   On unsettled matters like ethnic IQ differences or Quetzalcoatl, I just offer reasonable explanations, not assertions.  In searching for truth, it's good to let the chips fall where they may, regardless of our biases.  Would an Anglo like me normally celebrate Hong Kong and Korea as having the highest IQ's, on http://SQ.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm  - my most popular webpage?

Response from SaVaGeAssMeXiCaN: For the SAT scores, I was unable to find the same article I read before. But let me present some more information that supports my statement that oppressed, poor, and uneducated people are less likely to have higher IQ and SAT scores.

In Northern Ireland, Protestants, who are the dominant group, score 15 points higher than Catholics, the oppressed minority, on IQ tests.

Polish Jews were discriminated against when they first migrated to this country. During this time, they were considered to be an inferior race, and their IQs at the time reflected this. Russian Jews scored very low on IQ tests when they first came to America. Now both groups' IQs are above the average 100. You do not believe their oppression upon arrival had anything to do with those low scores?

Koreans & Japanese people are of the same race. The individual countries score around the same on IQ tests, as do Americans of those races. If they are the same, then why is it that Koreans who migrate to Japan, who become oppressed, score much lower on IQ tests than the Japanese or Koreans in Korea?

Perhaps the most dramatic example is the Northern Irish. Even though they come from the same ethnic group, Catholics (the discriminated minority) score 15 points lower on IQ tests than Protestants.

As I have stated before, oppression creates ignorance. As my GATE (class for students with IQs above 132) teacher once told me, you either know how to spell a word or you don't. Knowing a word doesn't make you any smarter than the next man. This can be applied to IQ and especially SAT tests, which uses vocabulary as a large part of the exam.

Sloan replies:  Your theory that oppression affects IQ may relate mostly to inadequate test procedures.  Immigrants to America and Japan often do not understand the questions as well as native born speakers, nor do they know the local culture of the tests. Your example of Northern Ireland is harder to explain.  I would welcome seeing the 15 point data you mention, plus what others have said about it.  Race does seem to contribute to differences in average group intelligence. Nobody would claim that Whites in America are oppressed because they get lower average SAT scores than Asian-Americans.  Might not African-American and Latino SAT results also reflect naturally different average IQ's, even after allowing for oppression and test imperfections?

NOTE: SaVaGeAssMeXiCaN appears to get many of his "facts" from http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-inferiorIQ.htm This website seems biased and scientifically unreliable.


From:

Peter S.
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:03:46 EDT
Subject: SQ Test
To: vansloan@yahoo.com

On your SQ test I scored 5 highs and 3 lows, and as far as I understand the test, I did good. But on the Utne.com SQ test I scored only a 25, a really low score. I checked out the answers on the Utne test, and it seemed most of the time you either picked the right answer or you get 0 points. On IQ tests I have scored well into the 130's, and I've known for a while my people skills are not the best (unfortunately), but I do have great personal ambition and motivation. Anyways, what's up with the big difference in results? Obviously, I much prefer your test. Peter S., Chicago

Sloan replies:  Peter, you're fooling yourself in preferring my test. It was designed primarily to list the talents that research shows are present in high social skills individuals.  (See http://SQ.4mg.com/traits_2437.htm). Unlike the Utne test, it is easy to guess the correct answers in my online SQ test.  Actually, the one test that really matters is what OTHERS think about your social skills.  And that can only be determined my doing a group SQ exercise, as at http://SQ.4mg.com/ru_social.htm As you have noticed in yourself, social skills and IQ are unrelated talents.   Unlike IQ which is fixed,  your SQ can be improved by practicing the qualities suggested in the male SQ test (such as projecting a happy, optimistic attitude).  Combining improved social skills with your already high IQ and ambition will add to your success. 


From:

"Glenn Sterley" <grsterley_z1z2z3z4z5z6z7z8z9z0@comcast.net>  
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: Nice try
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:02:05 -0700

But when I put your own figures into the spreadsheet, what it shows is that those with above average IQ voted evenly for Bush and Gore (12-12), average (100) voted 6-5 for Bush, and below average (99-) voted 12-4 for Bush.  So regardless of whether the "internet hoax" is true or not, based on your own model the lower IQ range is more likely to vote for Bush.

Sloan replies: Glenn, the purpose of my state IQ webpage was to provide better IQ data than what had been available.   Politics was not a consideration.  The most likely reason for the lower IQ's in southern states is their large Black population.   African-Americans consistently test at an average 85 IQ level.   Since Blacks overwhelmingly vote Democrat, the political spin that Democrat voters are smarter is muddled.  


Date:

Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:39:26 -0700
From: " Timothy C."
Subject: Polygamy and IQ
To: vansloan@yahoo.com

Along with the culling that harsh environments and pogroms create, there is the additional factor of reproduction styles.  In China, for instance, the nobility had dozens of wives and a great many peasants had no opportunity to reproduce at all.  It would be interesting to show a graph linking polygamy and effects on IQ, since those men who have the most resources will have greater opportunities to reproduce.  The middle east and Utah could also be used as test cases, especially Utah since detailed records are still kept.

Sloan replies:  Timothy, you might be right in cases where wealthy/ bright individuals have had a lot of children.   But today many more children are being born in lower IQ areas, such as Africa and Latin America, than in higher IQ areas like Europe and China.   That new trend seems more relevant than polygamy in the past.  In any case, there isn't much IQ data from before 1950. 


From:

"Malin Devins" <malindevins@hotmail.com>  
To: VanSloan@yahoo.com
Subject: IQ scores
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:46:33 -0400

Hello, I am searching for a list with all the different IQ scores for each states that will determinate if you are mentally challenged or not. I am doing a research paper for school.  Would you know where I can find something like that?  Thank you for your time,  Malin Devins, MI.

 Sloan replies:  Malin, my webpage http://SQ.4mg.com/IQ-States.htm lists average IQ for US states.  It also shows how those IQ's were calculated, using college admission test results.  Individual IQ's are a lot more varied.  For your research paper, you might find http://SQ.4mg.com/IQbasics.htm helpful.


From:

"John Kuzma" <jpkuzma@hotmail.com>  
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: Gifted article
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:44:17 -0400

I just read an article that was posted on the web regarding minorities in gifted education.  I was wondering what thoughts you may have regarding the different cut off scores based upon ethnicity.  I am assembling a gifted program in a charter school in Yougstown Ohio and I trying to select tests/assessments that would best serve this population.  I have not had great success locating culture-fair tests.  Can you help?

John, Eagle Heights Academy, Youngstown Ohio

Sloan replies:  John, you are struggling with the same problem that selective colleges deal with in admissions.  If you set different cut offs based on ethnicity, Asians and whites will complain.  If you don't, you will not achieve ethnic balance in an academically gifted program.  The fact that IQ averages around 103 for East Asians, 101 for whites, 92 for Latinos, and 85 for blacks means that all reasonable tests will produce weighted results.  The UC Berkeley admissions process produces a somewhat balanced class, but there is some truth in their campus scuttlebutt that Asians get A's, whites get B's, Latinos get C's and blacks get D's.  I think that recognition of IQ facts is much more honest than a fruitless search for "culture-fair" tests.   Point out to your students and parents that IQ is less than a third of what leads to financial success (see http://SQ.4mg.com/r_iq_ei.htm).


Date:

Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roger"  
Subject: IQ from 1958
To: vansloan@yahoo.com

I obtained my grade school transcript a few days ago and saw a reported IQ of 102 in 1959. I recall a grade school teacher telling me that I was not working up to my IQ.  Would the methodology of an IQ test taken in Missouri in the late 1950's give the same results of an IQ test taken today?  I attended grade school in Tennessee and recall meeting with two psychologists in the third or fourth grade before moving to Missouri and always thought it was odd.

Sloan replies: Roger, the IQ score you got in the late 1950's would be valid today.  The average IQ in Missouri is 101 (see http://SQ.4mg.com/IQ-States.htm) so your schoolwork should have been around the class average.  For some reason it wasn't, so you were given an IQ test to check out one possible cause.  If the IQ test they gave you was individually administered (as opposed to a class test), then your 102 score is quite valid.  In comparison, IQ tests on the Internet do not have much reliability.


From:

"Ryan"
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: Quick Question
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:47:46 -0500

Howdy,  Both of my parents are in Mensa - and advised me to get tested albeit I am not of age to join. I took an IQ test administered through a college (RU) for around $400, and I scored a 149. Yet, I have always had trouble with my grades! What do you think is wrong with me - or what should I do?

Sloan responds: Congratulations on you high IQ score, Ryan.  For the $400 spent, the college should offer counseling on your IQ test results, including why you are having trouble with grades.  You also should ask your school counselor and a favorite teacher to advise you on your IQ/ grades difference.  College admissions officials do not like big discrepancies between grades and SAT scores.  The sooner you get things figured out, the brighter you future will be.   


From:

"Dale Andrews" <dandrews@sport.rr.com>  
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: I.Q.'s of blacks vs. whites in America
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:02:22 -0500

Dear Mr. Sloan:

You deserve praise for your courage to tell the truth about the reasons  for I.Q. differences between blacks and whites. In the case of American blacks - who are far smarter than their African ancestors -  the differences are large enough for them to be a HUGE burden on white Americans, whose forefathers founded this country. The problems began with the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the forcible integration of public education. After the signing of the Act, our cities burned nightly for years, and even now, it takes little to set them off and boom: another riot.  America's  segregated schools were #1 in the world prior to the 60's. Whites resisted integration - for good reason. Now no caring parent would send their child to a school system with any significant black population. For northern liberals like Kerry and Kennedy, who've never had any real contact with blacks, exposing the reasons for intelligence differences means only one thing: the person making such a proclamation must certainly be a racist. The label is used frequently by such liberals like a stink bomb: it causes people to scatter and silences rational discussion. Keep telling the truth. The old saying goes like this: "The truth will set you free".

Respectfully,  D.H. Andrews

Sloan responds: Dale, I have a more optimistic view of the future for blacks in America.  Yes, most experts would agree that average IQ for African-Americans is fifteen points below the average IQ for other Americans.  But those same experts also agree that factors other than IQ (like social skills) account for MOST of the success of an individual.  (See http://SQ.4mg.com/r_iq_ei.htm).  All evidence points to no racial differences in the average level of these other success traits.   It is unfortunate that so much is made of the low test results in the schools of Washington DC or Oakland CA.  Their largely black students grow up thinking they will be failures.  If such students could spend some school time working on their improvable non-IQ skills, they would become more successful in the job market.  IQ is largely fixed, so efforts to make black academic scores match country averages are not likely to succeed.  But non-IQ success skills for blacks could easily match and perhaps surpass similar skills of whites.  Look at all our successful, personable, black TV personalities!  


From:

"chad"
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: question?
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:57:14 -0400

hey!    i hope you get this....and have some time to respond. i just stumbled across this web page. i have the worst social skills. i got depressed after high school trauma along with dysfunctional family trauma and went straight up boo radley. never left the house lived alone. ive been working full time and in counseling for almost two years, and my social skills have improved and anxiety reduced a little but not nearly enough. medication is no longer an option. my body is too sensitive to that stuff and i am clearer and happier without it. what can i do to improve self esteem..confidence..and especially social skills. i wanna go to college soon and take a new direction in life. im 22 years old. male. please say at least something.

Sloan responds:  Chad, it seems you are taking some good steps.   You recognize your problem, you are getting counseling, and you have a full time job.  On social skills, you might find that simply asking others about themselves is a useful first step.  There is little anxiety in being a good listener.  As you listen, you will learn that others have problems too, which should boost your self-esteem.   Gradually you will be sought out, as most people love the chance to talk about themselves!


Date:

Sun, 18 Jul 2004 03:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Josh "  
Subject: IQ question
To: vansloan@yahoo.com

hi, I'm a 15 year old half hispanic male that recently took an IQ test that said my IQ is 130 and I was wondering If that is like an advanced kind of placement because on your website it says the average IQ of americans is 98 which is significantly lower then my score and I'm akso presuming that is of adults  I just really wanted to know if that was a good thing?

Sloan replies: Josh, a 130 IQ score is at the level of the top 2 1/2% of Americans. You can see a graph on IQ scores and information on IQ/ careers at my
http://SQ.4mg.com/IQbasics.htm webpage. Hopefully you will do similarly well when you take the IQ-like SAT tests in a few years. That would help you get into an excellent college!


Date:

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:34:20 +0100 (BST)
From: "Dileep Kuttan" <dileepkuttan@yahoo.co.in>  
Subject: social quotient
To: VanSloan@yahoo.com

Dileep.P,, MEd Regular Student, University of Calicut, Kerala,  India.

Respected sir,        I am a student of the University of calicut,(Kerala state,India) Now I am studying for the course of  MEd  . We have to conduct a research work there. And I came to know about the 'social quotient ' and I would like to conduct my research work in that area.I collected many of the data available from the internet. Now I am in need of the following informations about the term social quotient.        1)the theoretical backgroung about the termSQ.        2)Is there any tool for measuring SQ other than the male,.female popularity test?If available please send me .       My guide is so much interested iin hearing about this SQand I too. If the above details about the term get, we will condut a research on Indian conditions. That will be a great advantage for our country, India.      So I humbly request that , please send me more information about social quotient as speed as possible. (especially the theoretical backgroung and the tool for measuring  social quotient)My Email address is given with my address above.  India,                                                            

Yours faithfully ,    Dileep.P

Sloan replies:   Dileep, thank you for your interest in Social Quotient.  The theoretical background for SQ is perhaps best explained in my http://sq.4mg.com/k_gardner.htm webpage.  And yes, there is a tool for measuring SQ much more accurately than the male/ female personality tests. 

One of the best introductions to that tool is the newspaper article read by most classes before they do the SQ survey (at  http://sq.4mg.com/ru_social.htm).   You can see the SQ survey form and all the research findings from 2500 students who have taken it by clicking pages at http://sq.4mg.com/site_outline.htm (especially the bottom half).


From:

"Catalano, Eloise" <CATALANOE@metro.net>  
To: "'vansloan@yahoo.com'" <vansloan@yahoo.com>
Subject: National records???
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:48:14 -0700

Is there a site that records IQ's taken during school years? How would one find out the actual number of ones IQ? Any info would be helpful. Thank You Eloise

Sloan replies:  Eloise, there is no such IQ records site. With privacy concerns, most people would strongly oppose such a site. If you know your SAT test scores, you can find your IQ from my http://SQ.4mg.com/IQ-SATchart.htm page. A next best way is to take IQ tests on the Internet. Many are free, and their quality varies. But if several come up with similar IQ's for you, that may be close to your actual IQ number.


From:

"Stangl, Gunnar" <Gunnar.Stangl@drkw.com>  
To: "'vansloan@yahoo.com'" <vansloan@yahoo.com>
Subject: www. sq.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:30:17 +0200

Hi there,   I just had a quick look at this site and have to take some issue with the Figure 1 you are presenting there. To suggest a linear relationship between IQ and national wealth not only a rather obscure idea, it also lacks any support from the data presented! The data should be separated in 2 (<100 and >100) or even 3 (<90, 90-99.99,100+) There is virtually NO relationship for avg. IQs ranging from 60 to 90 (they are all poor, with the exception of your odd oil states ..) - and if you look at the 100+ category, the relationship is actually negative. If the line has been fitted by Lynn & Vanhanen, it's probaly their fault, but if it was your idea I would strongly suggest to remove it.

Kind regards, Gunnar Stangl, CFA, Director, Head of Debt Index Strategy, Research,Capital Markets, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing, Warren Buffet

Sloan replies:  Sorry Gunnar, I have to disagree.  The relationship between IQ and national wealth is the major point of Lynn and Vanhanen's book.  The line in chart 1 reflects the high 0.733 correlation between IQ and wealth, and shows that the data DOES support the association.   Quibbling about the linearity of the relationship is for academics, not for a general information page on the Internet.  In any case, the chart and commentary were largely taken from another website: http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft.htm


From:

mahaswetaS@msn.com  
To vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: Arab and South Asian IQs
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:11:36 -0400

According to the mean IQs of different nations, Arab and South Asian mean IQs are below average.  How is it that in the United States' leading technological institutions (such as MIT, Caltech, Rensselaer, etc), Arabs and South Asians make up a significant portion of the student body? Next, if India's mean IQ is 81 (well below average), then how come all the high tech jobs are being outsourced to India? Also, how is the average IQ measured in a country so greatly populated as India?

Sloan replies:  A populous country like India with an average IQ of only 81 still has a bell curve distribution of intelligence.  Thus the percentage of its citizens who are very bright may not be high, but they number in the millions.  There are plenty with high IQ's to compete for positions at top US colleges or in getting outsourced jobs.  India was one of the countries where the available IQ testing data seemed sufficiently reliable to the authors of IQ and the Wealth of Nations to be included in the 81 countries they list.  IQ data for neighbors like Pakistan are only estimates.


From:

BKzFynst4Sho@aol.com  
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 02:02:25 EDT
Subject: Hi
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Hi...my name is Jessie, i'm 15 years old and I took an IQ test and my score was 136, i've been researching to see how good or bad that score is...can u please tell me how good or bad that is please???   I obtained a 136 out of what?

Sloan replies: Jessie, my webpage http://sq.4mg.com/IQ-SATchart.htm shows that 136 is higher than the IQ of 99% of Americans.  But most short IQ tests are not as reliable as college SAT tests, also shown on that page.  Hopefully you will also score well on your SAT's, helping you get into a good college!


From:

"kim" <kdlowe1@cox.net>  
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Subject: Research Paper
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 11:59:40 -0400

Sir,  I'm in need of information to compare and contrast  Howard Gardner (Multiple Intelligence) and Charles Spearman (Model Intelligence) for a research paper. Any help possible will be a life saver.     Thanks, Klo

Sloan replies:  Klo, when I placed "Charles Spearman  Model Intelligence" in Google search, one quite helpful entry came up: http://admin.vmi.edu/IR/ltsi.htm  - which includes

In 1904, Charles Spearman postulated a multiple-ability, factor model of intelligence. Based upon data he gathered on British soldiers during the Boer War, Spearman asserted that there were two types of factors for intelligence: a single dominant g-factor (g standing for general); and subsidiary s-factors (s standing for specific). As in the above quote, your assignment makes more sense as "model of intelligence" rather than "model intelligence."       The above quote on that webpage is followed by information on Gardner, including: Scientists such as Robert Sternberg and Howard Gardener began to postulate the existence of mulitple intelligences. While both these theories have receive much attention in recent years, we shall focus on the seven-intelligence theory of Howard Gardener. You might also check out my webpage on Gardner: 
http://sq.4mg.com/MIcriticisms.htm  which includes Gardner's theory is incompatible with g. The concept of g is an integral part of a widely accepted theory developed by Charles Spearman (1927) that intelligence is composed of a general ability (or g factor) which underlies all intellectual functions. Gardner argues that g has a scientific place in intelligence theory but that he is interested in understanding intellectual processes that are not explained by g.


From:

"HOLLYANN SHAW" <hollyannshaw@msn.com>  
To: info@pz.harvard.edu, VanSloan@yahoo.com
Subject: test scores
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:09:09 -0500

I am working on a master's project to prove that using MI in the classroom will improve student success/ achievement/ test scores.  Can you help me find links, articles, etc. on this subject.  I am having trouble finding data.  Thanks, Holly Shaw

 Sloan replies: Holly, when I put "Multiple Intelligences will improve student success/ achievement/ test scores"  into a Google search, the first item listed was: http://www.upublish.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581121504 -  on Differential Effects of a Multiple Intelligences Curriculum on Student Performance   book.  It looks helpful and includes a free download of first 25 pages of the book.  Other items listed in that Google search also may be helpful to you.


Subject:

Corruption Perceptions Index
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:29:19 +0200
From: "Russell_Swanborough_-_BCX_-_Enterprise_Application_Solutio ns" <Russell.Swanborough@bcx.co.za>  
To: vansloan@yahoo.com
Sir, Thank you for giving us the honour of a list on your sq e-mail site.  By coincidence, we were reading the 'Corruption Perception Index 2002' and it occured to us that there may be other correlations.  Finland, as least corrupt, has approx 50% private gun ownership. South Africa, about midway, has approx 5% private gun ownership. We wonder if the data is available from other countries that may show a broader correlation here?     Russell Swanborough & August Ndlovu

Sloan replies: Hello Russell & August:   Perhaps a Google search will help you find percentages of gun ownership in other countries.  It is unclear to me why a nation's corruption and gun ownership rates might be related.  I am forwarding your email to Ted in Thailand, who developed the pages on corruption for my website.  It is good to learn that you are finding my site stimulating!  (Copy to parhat@yahoo.com)


From:

"Rina Florido" <rina@etiok.com>  
To: vansloan@yahoo.com